If your definition of "bully" is articulating realities and placing logic into the equation and making your respinse look "challenged", I accept you calling me a "bully". Once again, a defense to an attack even if it is wrapped in flowers is still an attack and a defensive action can never be described as bullying.
And Yes, I expose the racist core of many of the thoughts that are put forth - including yours. And Yes, I explain the offensive insensitivities that are in many of the thoughts that are put forth that places the want to ride trolleys over the need of our kids to have functional schools/good learning environments. So, If the shoe of racism fits too comfortably, that's your problem. That's why so many people will be voting against their own self interest this Nov. - The shoe of racism has forged itself to their souls.
Furthermore, my passion is described as "hostile" by the "you's" of this world to deflect the ringing bells of truth just like the Republicans saying "under Obama, unemployment rose to over 8%. Really dude!! Even in this email I am "Hostile" but their response is described as "Forceful". Really!!
As to hugs - why don't you come hug me as many on the list serv already do hug me--Almost daily!! Here is your chance to be like White Jesus and save me with your hug. So yiu know, today, I had a someone tell me about 5 times that what I write is well thought out. Oh- he happened to be a very educated and intelligent White Man.
As to your picture, I don't need to see a picture of you. I know what you look like. I only questioned WHY when you started talking about this Republican nonsense that you took your picture down. Anyways, you should come talk that crazy nonsense in person and see my facial reactions. Come see me uncut.
As to imtimidating - maybe if you or they can have some intelligent responses, you wouldn't find me so intimidating. I have never felt intimidated by any of you. So you know, unless I am threatening you or others in my writings - which I never have - it is impossible for me to intimidate you or anyone else. So, what does that say to you about you?? It is not my fault that your positions are not fully thought out. Honestly, I am tired of logically clarifying all the half a** crap you and a few others write. I just amazes me how you under utilized your education. No wonder you took your picture down.
So you get it - it is me rising the cognitive dissonance in your head which is causing your discomfort and the fact that I won't let you and the rest get away with the ignorant bullcrap that you are used to. Try that nonsense elsewhere!!
Looking forward to seeing you soon.
Good Luck.
Rob
Rob,This is my last response to you, hate to burst your bubble. All you do is bully those who disagree with you. When a valid point is made, you turn hostile and attack commonly invoking race. Then, when someone replies to defend their position, you then imply that that person has a race issue because of how forceful they responded.I can only hope that sometime you will come to the realization that the world isn't against you. You aren't the only person out there that has had a rough go at it. If anger is what gets you through the day, fine, and if you need a hug, feel free to reach out to the listserv. I bet there are free hugs to go around.I still found it strange that you needed to see a picture of me when I tried to participate in a discussion. You never answered that. No need to respond, I'm sure you aren't as intimidating as you come off in email.Best,Jared
From: Rob <indianrob@gmail.com>
To: ward5@yahoogroups.com; wardfive@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WardFive] Re: [ward5] An Awesome Sight!!!
Jared,Smile!! Still waiting on a response to that list of truths I sent you a few days ago.RobOn Sep 6, 2012 6:20 PM, "Jared Wheeler" <jaredw23@yahoo.com> wrote:Eric,Don't be silenced man.Although I am not a fan of Coulter, I do appreciate her quote - "Conservatives get angry when you lie about them. Liberals get angry when you tell the truth about them."
From: Rob <indianrob@gmail.com>
To: ward5@yahoogroups.com; Ward 5 Google Groups <wardfive@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 6, 2012 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WardFive] Re: [ward5] An Awesome Sight!!!
Unless we are planning on changing the variables, this "food" has nothing to do with our discussion so it is like suggesting Chocolate to Diabetics (Republicans).What needs to be looked into is that 2 foot fence you like to straddle too comfortably. With your 31 in inseam, you don't feel it affecting you but that ground (respect) under you is slowly eroding and it will unexpectedly hurt you when it gives way.You were so bent on furthering your argument about this "no change" in unemployment that you are still digging. Hear me - a large percentage of people voting Republican are voting against their own best interest all based on skewed emotion tactics. The variety of faces this week at the DNC convention properly represents what America is supposed to be about says it all. That picture that we will see again tonight vs. a Very non inclusive Republican show last week is worth 1000000000000000000 words!!!Now stop riding that fence.Rob.On Sep 6, 2012 3:44 PM, "Eric" <ericindc@yahoo.com> wrote:
I did some research on the calculation of unemployment and I found it
very interesting. The unemployment rate is calculated from a
statistical sampling. In a quick nutshell, the Bureau of Labor
Statistics takes a sampling of households through a survey of about 60K
of households. This sample set is designed to select a representative
sample across the country. Every month 1/4 of the sample changes such
that a given household is not tracked for longer than 4 months. Once
you have been sampled for four months, you get an 8 month break and are
back in the sample for another 4 months. After that, you are out for
good. The sample set is random across the country and not based on
people who have filed for unemployment or unemployment benefits. This
is not a full explanation, but you get the point, but here is the real
crazy part of it. When people are surveyed, they are not actually asked
whether or not they are employed. They are asked about their activities
and these activities are "weighted" along with race, age and a number of
other factors. To keep track of these 60K of households, the
government employs over 2,200 people to do this.
Food for thought.....
--- In ward5@yahoogroups.com, "Eric J. Jones" <ejjones.threed@...>
wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> If you are going by unemployment you are incorrect, we aren't in any
better
> shape, we are the same. Check the Department of Labors data.
>
> Eric J. Jones
> - ejjones.threed@...
> On Sep 6, 2012 9:02 AM, "Rob" indianrob@... wrote:
>
> > So you get the numeric answer - YES, we arw better off 3 years after
the
> > highest unemployment since the Depression - all after a crazy 8 year
reign
> > and a stolen electiin. Now all of our main industry legs are
stabalized
> > and rebounding.
> >
> > Rob Ramson
> > On Sep 6, 2012 8:36 AM, "Rob" indianrob@... wrote:
> >
> >> Good morning Robby,
> >>
> >> Awesome question!! Now where were we exactly "4" years ago? Please
don't
> >> forget to include getting to unemployment rate of 10% in Oct 2009 -
3 years
> >> ago. So, the question that you and the Republicans should really be
asking
> >> are "Where was our Country headed 3 years ago and where is it
headed now? -
> >> in and out of the beltway.
> >>
> >> At 8.3% current unemployment, we are headed in the right direction
in
> >> less than 3 years. Last I checked, since the Depression, where the
> >> Republicans had us going from 2000 to 2009, was towards that same
level.
> >> So, saving the auto industry (LOTS OF JOBS) and stabalizing
Anti-America
> >> issues just by having the right Name!!!, helped to give us the
breathing
> >> room to turn the economy around.
> >>
> >> I am game to continue. So, Please continue with Rhetoric. By the
way,
> >> not basking in "glow of DNC Convention" but appreciating the
beautiful
> >> representation of a cultured/variety of colored filled America vs
one that
> >> is so not inclusive. Also, Hope and Faith may be names to you, but
your
> >> entire "survival now" is here today because your forefathers had
those
> >> "Names" to hang onto.
> >>
> >> Looking forward to a better response.
> >>
> >> Rob Ranson
> >> On Sep 6, 2012 1:19 AM, "RobbyCU" RobbyCU@... wrote:
> >>
> >>> **
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Or you have an example of failure. Hope and Faith are great, if
they are
> >>> the first names of people. But here we have a president that
hasn't
> >>> delivered on the gusto he put forth. I like him, really, but he's
failed
> >>> the Clintonian test. We are not better off than we were four years
ago. We
> >>> simply aren't. So while you may bask in the glow of the DNC
convention.
> >>> In the world outside the beltway people are broke, jobless, and
looking for
> >>> change. And that's not change in the President's future.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ___________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> "In everything you do. Always be yourself"- Lee Hall, Billy Elliot
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Nixon Farewell Speech to Whitehouse Staff:
> >>> http://youtu.be/XfNjpHAMy2E
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>> *From:* Rob indianrob@...
> >>> *To:* ward5@yahoogroups.com; Ward 5 Google Groups <
> >>> wardfive@googlegroups.com
> >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 6, 2012 12:54 AM
> >>> *Subject:* [ward5] An Awesome Sight!!!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Good evening,
> >>>
> >>> Just a thought - Just looking at the diversity being represented
at the
> >>> Democratic Convention compared to "no diversity" at the Republican
> >>> Convention, it is almost impossible to not realize which Party is
most
> >>> representative of America - says the diversity of the audience.
While both
> >>> sides has their faults and plays the game or politics really well,
I am
> >>> just proud that so many have taken the steps towards equality for
> >>> everyone!! So, While Change may have been made difficult over the
last 4
> >>> years, we still survive on FAITH (Belief) AND HOPE (prayer)!!!
> >>>
> >>> A PICTURE, PERFECT!!
> >>>
> >>> Rob Ramson
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> R. Ramson
> >>> 3744 12th Street, N.E.,
> >>> Washington D.C., 20017
> >>> 202-438-5988
> >>>
> >>> "We must become the change we want to see" - Mohandas Gandhi-
> >>> (Together, for a Brighter Tomorrow)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> > WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for
community
> > discussion and information sharing.
> >
> > To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive?hl=en
> >
>
__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (21) To Post a message, send it to: ward5@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: ward5-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
.
__,_._,___
WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for community discussion and information sharing.
To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment