Agreed
Sent from my HTC smartphone on the Now Network from Sprint!----- Reply message -----
From: "Eric" <ericindc@yahoo.com>
To: <ward5@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [ward5] Re: The Constitution: part 2
Date: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 11:29 AM
Best thing I have heard so far.
--- In ward5@yahoogroups.com, KPW <WKPW3@...> wrote:
>
> The mayor should tell the media that he is not going to run for re-election in 2014 and maybe we can get some peace. He can resign December 2014.
>
>
> ___________________
> KPW
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KPW <WKPW3@...>
> To: ward5 <ward5@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Fri, Jul 20, 2012 10:37 am
> Subject: [ward5] The Constitution: part 2
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.examiner.com/article/the-constitution-part-2-1
>
>
>
> The Constitution: part 2
>
> JO-ANN ARMAO
> JULY 19, 2012
> BY: ROBERT VINSON BRANNUM
>
> The recent interview by a member of the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia (USAtty/DC) reveals not the dedication of the office to root out government corruption, but rather strongly indicates the USAtty/DC cannot bring charges and will not bring charges against Mayor Vincent C. Gray.
>
>
>
> If the USAtty/DC had a winnable case it would not be conducting newspaper interviews regarding an on-going investigation. And because the USAtty/DC may not be able to present and prove a case against Mayor Grayin a court of law, it has chosen to convict him without presenting charges in the court of public opinion.
> Any good defense lawyer wisely advises his client, particularly a high-profile one to remain silent to preserve and protect all Constitutional rights. It is up to the government to make a charge and to prove its case.
> However, while Ms. Jo-Ann Armao and The Washington Post believe journalists must have protection from lawsuits and demands or documents and records, they evidently do not believe individuals should be accorded similar protections available under the United States Constitution. How shameful and reprehensible.
> The Washington Post poll showing a majority of District residents want Mayor Gray is untrustworthy, facially dishonest, and skewed to receive its desired results. Ms. Armao and The Washington Post display the height of intellectual arrogance when they demand the people should be respected because of the results of this poll; yet they editorialize the people's views on issues like District public education reform and school closings should be ignored.
> It is obvious Ms. Armao, The Washington Post, and columnists who do not have any intellectual connection to the people of the District of Columbia are on a newspaper mission to perform a mayoral coup.
> Ms. Armao and The Washington Post believe they have created a perfect storm to run Mayor Gray from office. They argue because they act like bullies on the playground and have been calling Mayor Gray all kinds of names and he has refused to respond their antics that he should leave the playground to them. Nuts.
> Ms. Armao, The Washington Post, and many other journalists laugh and grin at the concept the Constitution does protect persons who are not journalists and does not require anyone to speak to them or to be afraid of them. Ms Armao and The Washington Post are on the unethical receiving end of selected leaks which they publish anonymously to damage Mayor Gray. Isn't this evidence of a corrupt and unethical editorial board?
> By the way when did Mr. Harold Meyerson and Mr. Dana Milbank become so knowledgeable on District politics? When did they start going to community meetings across the District?
> Ms. Armao and The Washington Post are not supporters of Mayor Gray and have a particular interest in dividing the city and promoting political polarization. The real interest of Ms. Armao andThe Washington Post is to intimidate and to scare.
> Ms. Armao and The Washington Post have been pressuring the USAtty/DC to charge Mayor Gray with anything related to his 2010 mayoral campaign. However, Ms. Armao and The Washington Post do not have the patience to wait for the slow wheels of justice to grind.
> The following is a quote from the website of the USAtty/DC:
>
> "The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. As such, he is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape or innocence suffer. He may prosecute with earnestness and vigor -- indeed, he should do so. But, while he may strike hard blows, he is not at liberty to strike foul ones. It is as much his duty to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one."
>
> The USAttyDC cannot hold up its professional integrity - clearly something Ms. Armao and The Washington Post lack - in the fight against government corruption and do an end run around the constitutional rights of Mayor Gray.
> The hypocrisy of Ms. Armao and The Washington Post on the principle of respecting due process, justice, and fairness is obvious. The leaks from the USAtty/DC need to be plugged and investigated. If not, it shows the USAtty.DC was purposely releasing information on the investigation.
> The United States Attorney for the District of Columbia should not become the devil it despises and succumb to the political trickery of Ms. Jo-Ann Armao and The Washington Post.
> E-mail contact information; rbrannum@...
> Twitter: @robert158
>
>
> The Constitution Part 1
> http://www.examiner.com/article/the-constitution
>
__._,_.___.
__,_._,___
--
R. Ramson
3744 12th Street, N.E.,
Washington D.C., 20017
202-438-5988
"We must become the change we want to see" - Mohandas Gandhi-
(Together, for a Brighter Tomorrow)
--
WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for community discussion and information sharing.
To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive?hl=en
0 comments:
Post a Comment