Monday, 17 September 2012

[WardFive] Re: [ward5] SIMMONS: Anesthetized to random D.C. violence, By Deborah Simmons - The Washington Times Sunday, September 16, 2012

Goid morning Matt,

Fair response. However, just as Mrs. Simmons used "assumptions", you also assumed that she was assuming that "many or all of the violence we see in DC is random".  As of right now, this article did not identify whether the assailants knew the victims.  So, until that information is presented, we can assume that it is as much "random" as "not" random. Are we to assume that the crime in Mr. Obama's neighborhood is linked to "less-than-legal" activity that led to the crimes?

I wonder why your focus was to identify that "almost all shooting victims know each other" in an attempt to discredit the author when the focus of the article dealt with the seemingly "anesthetized" community response. As a matter of reminder, your friend Robby was more concerned about the floor being messed up and our Commissioner using his Govt. Email to deal with an insensitive remark by a resident in the community.

Now, to your point - a lot of violent crime does have some previous involvement - either illegal or domestic (let's not forget). Anyways, let's follow your line of thought:

1.  So how do we get to the root of the "problem".

2. Why do you think that many people in these neighborhoods turn to less-than-legal activities?

Rob

On Sep 17, 2012 8:56 AM, "Matt Ashburn" <matt@mattashburn.com> wrote:
 

One of the assumptions made by the author is that most, or all, of the violence we see in DC is random.  In fact, however, almost all of the violence is not random at all.  Almost all shooting victims know their attackers, and a good number (though, not all) are involved in some less-than-legal activity that led to the shooting.   The author's incorrect assumption that simply dismisses violence as "random" won't do anyone any good if actually wanting to get to the root of the problems.
 
Matt
 


 
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:12 PM, KPW <WKPW3@aol.com> wrote:
 


Excerpt from article
These are the very random acts of violence that should leave us soul-searching.

Why do our communities so easily gin up sympathy and empathy for a hate-crime victim and even hold rallies for justice, but just shake our heads when the victim, left dead or alive, is from a neighborhood pockmarked by crime or happened to be out and about in the 'hood at 2 a.m.?

It's like we have given up.

It's like we decided that guns are the problem, when what we have is a people problem.

We know that much of violence in the Mideast is rooted in anti-American sentiment with them showing and telling us so.

But what or who do the nefarious American criminals hate?




SIMMONS: Anesthetized to random D.C. violence

-
The Washington Times
Sunday, September 16, 2012
ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The loudest headlines in local news are often about shootings, stabbings and assorted mayhem, events that should routinely leave us questioning whether we even value life anymore.

Have we become anesthetized to such violence?

In the nation's capital, a half-dozen people were victims of gun violence during 18 hours' worth of ticks of the clock between Friday and Saturday.

While much violence occurs under the cover of darkness, brazen gunmen also do their dirty deeds in the daytime, and we do not seem to notice or care.

Andrea Noble, one of my colleagues, reported that two of the D.C. shootings occurred in broad daylight on Friday.

"The first occurred in the 5100 block of Fitch Street in Southeast around 12:53 p.m.," she wrote. "A man was walking through the area when a truck he did not recognize pulled up alongside him, and one man got out and came toward him. The man began firing a gun at him, striking him in the leg as he tried to run away."

Later, about 5 p.m., "a man was shot in the 500 block of Parkland Place in Southeast. Police had few details about that attack, other than that a man approached the victim and shot him in the back," her report said.

There was no mention of a religious or gender angle. No mention of any other hate crime or an angle about a tourist, veteran or military service member. There was no mention of drugs, a school, hospital, house of worship, funeral, movie theater or mall — the types of scenes that usually draw texts like "OMG."

And in Chicago, where violence has left former Obama administration guru Rahm Emanuel conceding that, as mayor, he needs the feds' help to stop the hemorrhaging, gun violence has even struck President Obama's neighborhood, which we know is always in the sight lines of various law enforcement patrols.

On Friday and Saturday in the Windy City, 10 people were shot, three fatally.

These are the very random acts of violence that should leave us soul-searching.

Why do our communities so easily gin up sympathy and empathy for a hate-crime victim and even hold rallies for justice, but just shake our heads when the victim, left dead or alive, is from a neighborhood pockmarked by crime or happened to be out and about in the 'hood at 2 a.m.?

It's like we have given up.

It's like we decided that guns are the problem, when what we have is a people problem.

We know that much of violence in the Mideast is rooted in anti-American sentiment with them showing and telling us so.

But what or who do the nefarious American criminals hate?

I think average Americans can find answers and solutions if we take a closer look at ourselves, our families, our neighbors — our villages.

Law enforcers can only do so much, and much of what they do is after the fact.

"We have to educate and re-educate ourselves. Too many young people and young adults don't know who they are and how they got here," said Ted Farris, a retired deputy sheriff in West Palm Beach, Fla. "How are they going to know where they're headed if we don't tell them?"

Ted is right, and you know it.

We have an opportunity to let John Law carry a small nightstick and use it to rule any given situation after the fact, or we can try to prevent crime the old-fashioned way by re-empowering our neighborhood Big Mamas and Big Daddies, the cultural icons who carry big sticks, preach that every life — regardless of station — is precious.

Life and death

Ted and his three children lost a wife and mother this week following her brief battle with cancer.

Jewel was a lifelong educator who inspired her students, and her students inspired her.

She didn't need a big stick; she had a steady nudge, a ready smile and a yes-you-can attitude.

RIP, Jewel.

Deborah Simmons can be reached at dsimmons@washingtontimes.com.





__._,_.___
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a New Topic Messages in this topic (2)
Recent Activity:
To Post a message, send it to:   ward5@eGroups.com
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: ward5-unsubscribe@eGroups.com
.

__,_._,___

--
WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for community discussion and information sharing.
 
To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive?hl=en

0 comments:

Post a Comment