So, I hear you Leslie.
The issue is still over imposition on Turkey Thicket -- but let's say we don't have any schools available, we still can't be be expected to go into this blindly without the functionality details being ironed out. So you understand, they are only being this generous with using parts of the school as additional space for the Rec. because they need something from us --- they want the community to agree on the Co-Usage. Wait and see when it remains separate and we will see how much of it the Community gets to use as part of a Rec. Center needs.
Now for the rest of your response which might add a little more info to Widen your Scope:
1. Yes while Taft is "gone", they are doing a joint program in Southeast at a Charter School. So this is not a foreign subject. Taft is big enough, it is built for a large middle school and has fields galore for activities -- WHICH Middle Schoolers Need and would enhance the fields to the betterment of both the Charter and a DCPS Middle School.
2. While Backus is not a guarantee, it is a Great Conversation worth having -- For Ward 5 and and for exactly for the reasons that you discussed about Ward 4. Furthermore, I am not worried about facilitating UDC at Backus those are grown folks that we are talking about and they can be put anywhere if they are interested in developing themselves, in any Ward, in any of the closed schools or DCPS buildings --- Including the DCPS bldg. downtown -- the one that most people don't know about on 13th and K, N.W. (I believe -- I think that is still available) -- where they could be surrounded by a VISION of WORKING PEOPLE every day. So, our young kids come first on this location and it is a conversation worth having -- last I checked, UDC is having financial issues so this might be a Great opportunity for them.
3. As to Hamilton -- kids and teachers walk from Brookland to Taft everyday and Hamilton is closer to a Metro than Taft. DC can use any building to house students temporary. And even though it hasn't been used as a school for decades -- I have $50 Million reasons that says that it could happen. And I am not sure about this METRO thing being a necessary thing for Middle Schoolers - lots could happen from a lack of "decision" ability at 11, 12 and 13. Those are delicate years to be out travelling by self and for that to be the focus of a LOCATION!! Highly insensitive.
** the problem here might be the use of the field there -- I believe that a high school has a lease over there and also the Govt. may want to develop this as it is so close to Union Market and the rest of the development coming there. Not that we couldn't work around both issues. (A Bridle to the Brookland Site if that wasn't disclosed)
4. Langdon -- $50 Million says we can tear that down just like they can tear Brookland down. Both are built for elementary kids. Furthermore, there is a piece of land that belongs to DC that sits between the field and the first house on the SE side of the fenced field across from the Senior Center that is about 50' X 200 that could extend the playground area. Furthermore, the kids should have been moved from Langdon to Marshall over by Costco. It is nicer and has a pool -- (I believe Brian Bradford touched on this a while back) but I guess that they could always enclose Langdon's Rec. Pool if they want to expand on our kids experience with learning lifetime skills unlike Rae Zapata's feelings towards Middle School kids not having the time for swimming. So if her statement doesn't Say Vision Missing, then I can't say much other than it reinforces why she believes W5COE of past and the "Community" picked Brookland.
Once again, not too late for DCPS unless they have other plans for Marshall -- like a Charter School or Development and the fact that they are building houses so enrollment has a better chance. This leaves Langdon available with enough space to build a Middle School -- I believe it is closer to kids who will utilize it which is different from "middle of the Ward BS -- the difference is not that much in travelling time!!!
In about 7 - 10 years, with the movement of European Americans into the area, this will be a new School for kids here and the others will still look the way they do -- will be all part of the restructuring to bring kids back from NW -- Last I checked, Brookland is Heavily White and heading more that way. Just calling it the way I see it -- My opinion.
I am not believing this "choice" of W5COE but more guided by DCPS as to locations based on "Central Location". Central to our kids who need a middle school would be Langdon or even a Bunker Hill or should have been thought through for Taft.
4. So, I am with you about the after school activities at the rec. centers. I am assuming that it can be coordinated for kids to be dropped off at their perspective recs for this -- not just a opportunity for kids at the Turkey Thicket rec. center as a selling point for this location. So, "This is OUR opportunity to develop fantastic programming activities for our younger citizens" should be done ANYWAYS -- regardless of whether we build here or not.
5. So, I am with you on the PK - 8 nonsense and the fact that our kids have been short changed for too long. I understand their "segregation" movement and am with you on building schools. The reality is that I have seen kids learn and perform better in much WORSE conditions!! So while building schools is awesome, it would be nice if DCPS embraces your ideas on the academic side. I might have one or two as well.
6. Hilarious is the focus -- sales job -- on WORLD LANGUAGE as lots of our kids can't read, comprehend English properly . So, I could care less about "World Language" that seems to be the new "freedom bell ringing". I took 2 years of Spanish and live in a Hispanic World and hardly use Spanish!! When it comes to the kids that I am focused on, they get a double order of English and Math, an order of Science, a side of Music, Art, PE and DREAMS TO GOALS and Exposure to the "White W class -- with a heavy focus of English and Math being utilized Subliminally -- Because they won't be using Spanish, French, Latin and the rest in Jail -- as that is where they are heading. But, a foreign language doesn't hurt -- only takes time away from real problem solving solutions. Funny - tell me the proficiency again of the kids who will be attending this Middle school.
Here is where we agree -- "Personally, I like the idea that the architects showed with the school on the far end of the block (edge of Michigan and 10th). It allows for a drop off access road (which is not designed for metro buses), places the school even closer to the metro, further from a residential street and allows the playground to be built as originally planned, with room to expand to the site of the current Brookland".
The only issue with this is that at a quick glance, I was able to realize that the school needed to be on the 10 Street side of that corner to allow for a entrance from Michigan Ave and exit to Otis with parking for the school facing Michigan Ave. Also, if DDot can figure it, maybe even an indented lane on Michigan for Buses to park to allow for flow of cars to front of school to drop off and teachers to access parking lot. It is not a good site to come across a bridge and be sandwiched in between the school and Condo building -- like a wall. In addition, a recessed building allows for more open space and there would not be a need to lose space to Quincy cutting through from 10th the Michigan Ave. And the Design would be more Grand to look at from Michigan and still flow to Turkey Thicket.
***A reason that they might not be pushing this is that I believe that Catholic and Carroll might have a lease on the baseball diamond*** and maybe that DDot may have some time issues with planning the Quincy Street cut through -- something that would be eliminated if they use my design suggestion..
Still, we should see if we could get the 3 Houses on Shepherd Street and we still need to work through any dual usages prior -- especially the pool.
Extra -- Written by
A Father of 1 who Loves Kids and whose focus is to figure out how to get every child the oppotunities they have a right to, who understands that a Great School Building is not the same as a "Great School" or high performing Kids. You can show me all the studies and I will tell you about friends I grew up with whose shoes were remnants of a shoe and were high performers. I will show you kids here in our schools who with a little brushing up would be much better performers.
I also definitely understand that no matter how beautiful a school is, if there is an opening at a high performing Charter or other "Great" School -- like the STEM school at Mckinley, I don't believe your child will go to a school that may be filled with underperforming kids fed from Langdon or Bunker Hill. And since you are a teacher and I know that you are a dedicated person -- there is a good chance your child will be going to the "ARTS" School here in Brookland if better opportunities are available.
BROOKLAND SIT as well via folks like Eric and You who are quite capable. So you know, I didn't want to come on the SIT team as I didn't want to be frustrated as Eric has been and I don't have a Half Speed -- I jump in with both feet. Furthermore, when he invited me on, I declined as I was comfortable with him and also found out that Faith and you were on there as well. Also, I thought that this would give Eric the Breathing Room to suck him out and into the War rather than a few words behing the Computer screen. He has a lot to offer and especially as a White Man who is passionate/real about things -- not only when it affects White Folks.
Rob Ramson
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Leslie Jones <lesliedwjones@gmail.com> wrote:
My responses to the proposed locations being tossed around-Taft and Backus are gone...While it has been suggested that UDC may abandon the location at Backus- that's not a guarantee and it would be unfortunate because the District (and Ward 5) needs a community college option. Backus is metro accessible (green and red). Let's move forward from that conversation. And, just for clarity, only two schools in Ward 5- Wheatley and Browne will remain EC's.Hamilton, while it is designed to be a junior high, is not in a great location- not as close to a metro (you can see the metro from the end of the block by Turkey Thicket- its 5 short blocks), in southern Ward 5, among other things. Its also the building DCPS frequently uses when it needs to house students temporarily which, I imagine, is why DCPS has kept it in its inventory despite it not being used as a school consistently for decades.Langdon-- its an ELEMENTARY school (as is Bunker Hill) They are not built to hold bigger children. The bathrooms are too small, the halls are too small, the gym doesn't have locker rooms for children to change. There is no space to really build out around either one, especially if we want to try to have an athletic field or parking. Ask any architect (or watch HGTV for awhile) and they will tell you its much easier to start from scratch and get what you want than it is to add to an existing building. And again, not really metro accessible. Rob, I'd like some data to support your comment about young girls becoming pregnant because they ride the metro...This brings me to Eric's comment about the use of the rec for after school activities. I work in a middle school in MD. The Dept of Rec partners with staff members to offer activities after school for the students. This is the 2nd school in MD where I've worked where this has been done. The idea that students would 'encroach' upon the rec because they are using it is concerning. They are DC residents and have the right to use the rec just like the rest of us. Wouldn't it be better for them to use it in some sort of constructive, organized and supervised manner? I know there is plenty of data indicating that children of this age get into more trouble after school when they are unsupervised. This is OUR opportunity to develop fantastic programming activities for our younger citizens.As for the urgency--our children have been shortchanged far too long. This PK-8 nonsense does not adequately serve our children. Ward 5 has the most out of ward and charter enrolled students. (Mine are about to become part of that number) Many people are choosing this route because they don't feel the schools are as good, many people are choosing this route because they want their kids to go to Deal, enduring a ridiculous commute in order to do so. Deal is overcrowded, largely due to so many out of bounds students. It won't continue this way for much longer--read all the articles about the plans for rezoning schools and not allowing out of bounds children to follow the feeder patterns. A school must be ready to receive children when this occurs. We need to be working together to build great schools, PK-high school, in Ward 5 (all wards, really) We shouldn't be forced to gamble with our children's education, hoping they get in to a particular DCPS or charter. There are enough families in this area to fill several schools and work to make them great. We need to stop acting like their ice is colder when the reality is, its our ice that's helping to keep it that way. And we really should include the segment of Ward 4 off of South Dakota because those children were consolidated into LaSalle when Backus closed. They need a good middle school as well. If done right (and I have a LOT of ideas for the academic side) we can attract Ward 4 students as well. We can discuss DCPS' idea for an Arts/World Language Integration school at another time.For the record, I've not developed an opinion regarding merging the two buildings or keeping them separate. Looking into it, I see many jurisdictions across the country that have found successful ways to make co-locating work. Personally, I like the idea that the architects showed with the school on the far end of the block (edge of Michigan and 10th). It allows for a drop off access road (which is not designed for metro buses), places the school even closer to the metro, further from a residential street and allows the playground to be built as originally planned, with room to expand to the site of the current Brookland.Finally, let's not forget that for several decades there was an open school on this site; and that Brookland was an EC, housing middle school students (may not have been designed to be so, but it was from at least the mid-90's until it was closed.)
Leslie Jonesmother of 3, including a 2nd grade child who will need a great school, sooner rather than laterBrookland SIT
On Saturday, March 16, 2013, wrote:--Group: http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive/topics
- [ward5] Ward5 discusses proposed middle school at Turkey Thicket in Brookland: Standalone vs. Co-location with Recreation Center [5 Updates]
- Adult Garden Education Classes near the Fort Totten Metro [1 Update]
- DC & Fairfax Scholarships and Internships (deadlines April 8 and April 14) [1 Update]
- The Ward 5 Report: Office of Councilmember Kenyan R. McDuffie [1 Update]
- Puzzled? [1 Update]
Rob <indianrob@gmail.com> Mar 15 10:28AM -0400
Few more details about last night,
Last night was a second community meeting regarding the Ward 5 Arts Middle
School that is being planned with the intent of demolishing the current
Brookland Elementary (Michigan/12th) and somehow building a New Middle
School to combine that Site and building upon Turkey Thicket's Site.
Let's list some points that were covered,
1. From the attempts being made, the architect and DCPS has basically
concluded that the Existing Brookland Elementary site is Way too Small to
put a Middle School. So, if we all remember Middle School, that age group
demands a lot of outdoor space to recreate.
2. Backing up a bit -- the previous W5COE administration demanded a few
Middle Schools in Ward 5. Amazing that a School System had an entire Ward
without a Middle School -- the Largest populated Ward. Amazing -- isn't it.
Makes you wonder about the angles that were put into place.
3. W5COE of past made the decision with DCPS that this existing Brookland
Elementary School site was a "perfect" location for a Middle School because
of proximity to Rec. Center, to Metro, and that it is Centrally Located in
Ward 5. So far, So good. But at the same time, a STEM Middle School is
placed at McKinley -- which has all the academic and recreational bells and
Whistles for Science, Technology, Engineering, Math capable students -- and
rightfully so because it feeds right into to McKinley Tech -- both of these
schools at this location designed for top performing kids.
4. Back to the Proposed Brookland Middle -- An "ARTS" school designed for
kids -- Feeder more than likely Bunker Hill. Somehow this school is
overwhelmingly attaching itself to Turkey Thicket Rec Center and its
grounds.
5. At no point over the 3 years of prior negotiations/discussions did the
Previous W5COE or DCPS inform the community that building a Middle School
at the current Brookland Elementary Site would incorporate CO - Sharing the
Turkey Thicket Facility and Grounds. Not sure if W5COE knew of this
possibility or not or they were just grabbing a location because they were
happy to get a Stand Alone Middle School for our Kids -- a Basic Right that
was taken away by closing Backus and Taft -- the latter which was given
away to a Charter Middle School -- What Gives?
6. Now that the concepts/plans are being designed -- Turkey Thicket Rec.
Center has now become over taken with facilitating a Middle School on it's
site thus reducing its Green Space and causing various scheduling conflicts
from multi use of space.
7. A selling point is that this approach would enhance the property,
create some extra spacial use after school hours and during summer of parts
of the New School. Not a bad perspective if that is *the only location* *that
we as a community* have to work with for our KIDS Middle School. I believe
that there are options but it is not being explored properly or with the
intent to make it happen.
8. Seems like some of our Community think that we stand to "lose" if we
don't accept this Middle School Turkey Thicket Space. Very Similar to if we
don't give into the 901 Monroe development team disregarding the
Community/SAP and exceeding agreed upon parameters, we would end up with
nothing.
8. The Tactic that has usually worked in the past -- divide and conquer
and get enough people saying yes to the "Plan" that they can just say --
well we know that we can't satisfy everyone but enough support was reached,
so we went ahead with it. Of course, in this scenario, this is not
happening -- whether it is the seniors, the playground enthusiasts, the
rec. staff bad experiences with similar situations elsewhere, those
interested in the School, our Green Team, etc. --- too many different
entities have issues with the Plans to CO-Use the space.
9. Here we are.
a. So, I believe the RFP to identify a developer went out last July -- I
wonder who won the "bid" or was this arranged. I believe that they have
already everything in place -- looks like a project manager and team is
present.
b. A SIT team was chosen to help DCPS identify/create a curriculum to
provide as well as have input on "design".
c. Seems like even though they had their input -- two weeks ago, they were
blindsided with "let's see if we can show something to the community that
we have been told to create" and see if we can override the SIT team's
input.
d. Two weeks later (last night) -- at the second presentation, not much
changed after the community communicated that CO-USE of the facility was
not what was wanted. 3 of the four Concepts were still heavily focused on a
CO-USED facility -- with a sales point that the Rec. Center would benefit
from extra space when school was not using some of its' building that could
be shared with the Rec. Center.
e A lady identified that there are only 3 showers in Womem Locker Room --
can't imagine enough space for Girls to utilize Pool. Sure it would be same
for boys.
****** I must share that Rae Zapata felt strongly that swimming is not
going to be part of the Middle School Curriculum because the kids will be
too busy with other things to include this as part of their activity
******* In my opinion and seemingly from many others -- we strongly
disagree with this. Seems to me that when you make statements like this,
there are some things left to be questioned ******** From what I
understand, if a principal wants swimming to be part of a curriculum, then
that pool gets utilized -- that's why the focus on attaching the buildings.
f. 250 Plus Signatures were collected (and more to come) by Brookland
Bridge Blog manager (Shani) that identified the 4 issues that the community
have -- previously posted on Brookland and Ward 5 Yahoo List Serv.
*****Wish this petition was picked up and circulated by our Council Office
to all other List Servs. in the Ward as this Middle School is not just a
Brookland Issue ******
**** A Must Know - Ward 5 Council Member Kenyan McDuffie was very
passionate as he adamantly demanded that DCPS, DGS, Etc. all listen to the
fact that majority of the community is demanding a NON - SHARED site and to
create a design that reflected that. Also, he demanded that these offices
communicate better with the community -- I must say -- Great JOB. He spoke
with adamant concern for the lack of respect that the community is being
given and the representing departments continued failure to implement the
concerns of the community. Shows Much Growth!!
***** My Passionate Frustration with their lack of respect brought a loud
exclamation -- WHY DOES A CM have to tell heads of Depts. to "COMMUNICATE"
with the community!! At what point do we stop babysitting GROWN FOLKS in a
manner that we have to DEMAND the most BASIC of their JOB DESCRIPTION!!
What sucks is that this is a habitual conversation with no repercussions to
people who continue to abuse the community **** I will never understand why
"communication" is such an issue on every project.
g. Seniors complain that this would inhibit their use of Turkey Thicket
h. Current and Future users of playground concerned about the money being
lost that would be used for the playground that is scheduled to be
installed and that it wouldn't be accessible.
i. Three of the Concepts added buildings to the current Turkey Thicket
Building that would allow for Co-Use of Space. Very few of those who
attended are for this and most everyone wants totally separate facilities.
j. There was one "concept" plan that did looked like a "State of the Art"
Middle School *should look* with a Field (Soccer/Football/Track -- which is
a plus). Not much was said about it at all but from a sales perspective, it
seems like that is what the carrot is meant to do. It places the new Middle
School at the Southern End of Turkey Thicket (close to the Exxon) with much
of the School along Michigan and Otis and part of 10th (a horseshoe shape)
and separated from Turkey Thicket by allowing the now disjointed Quincy to
connect from 10th to Michigan to allow for buses, drop-off.
*** doesn't make sense to me as;
1. It looses too much space to a Street that buses will have tough time
making turns onto and maneuvering around each other.
2. It creates a Wall as you drive North coming over the Michigan Ave Bridge
between the Condo Building on right and that Concept design for a New
Middle School
3. *** from a common sense approach -- it would make sense to place a
building along the 10th Street side and have a circular drive way coming
off of Michigan Ave and running behind parking for the school facing
Michigan ave -- with the exit from the school onto Otis adjacent to the
Exxon.
Now that is if that was just another identification that even the
Architects are not paying attention to utility of space. This site design
does swaps/re-allocate land use from Park and Recs to DCPS and allow for a
Real Track and Field atmosphere
a. draw back -- the field is artificial surface which looses our green
space -- what everyone is fighting for.
b. draw back -- we loose our baseball field.
c. draw back -- we loose event space that is sometimes held on the Baseball
field area
I keep suggesting that they utilize Luke C. Moore as it will allow for
more attend
******An option that they haven't spoken about* -- buying the three houses
on the southern part of 1000 Blk. of Shepherd Street N.E. behind the
current Brookland Elementary School and incorporating that into the Design
for the school to provide additional space for underground parking, above
that -- Track and field (soccer and football) and allowing more space for
their gym and an entire street for buses and to drop off****** (I am sure
for the right money, they would sell)
Complaint from resident that no link to plans/concepts on internet and not
getting responses. DCPS seem to think that placing the various "concept"
architectual plans on a website for the community to be able to view is too
much to expect in this age of technology
RFP that went out last July for New Brookland Middle --
http://dc.gov/DC/DGS/Opportunities/RFP+for+Design+of+New+Brookland+Middle+School
--
R. Ramson
3744 12th Street, N.E.,
Washington D.C., 20017
202-438-5988
"We must become the change we want to see" - Mohandas Gandhi-
(Together, for a Brighter Tomorrow)
Rob <indianrob@gmail.com> Mar 15 04:37PM -0400
Not doubting all that. Let's not be confused -- I am not taking anything
away from those (including Rae - which this was to be a legacy stepping
stone / some politics to being a CM) who worked towards getting back what
was RIGHTFULLY ours to begin with that some CM's allowed taken in the first
place -- maybe including Kwame - especially when the school focus was Ward
3. In addition, had there not been a DCPS need to set forth this
segregation movement along with the Charter School push, we would not be
geting any schools. Our kids in this side has not historically been a
priority and last I checked, no marketing effort has ever been done to keep
our DCPS schools "enrolled".
Again my questions of Rae not being surprised or shell shocked and apalled
like the rest of us is a valid "wonder" like she already knew - telling
statement to me. If that's the case, that's Sad. I also wonder why as a
lawyer, she is willing to accept "let's build it as a CO-Share with the rec
center and iron out the details of use afterwards. That usage agreement
should be done first (trust me - I have made that stupid mistake many times
of trusting folks) so that our seniors, our concerned playgrounders (who
mostly could care less about a school if it affects them) don't get
clobbered!!
Like I said - we need a state of the art Rec. Center and this location
would be best since so much development is coming close to here. There are
many other sites for schools but that is my 1 of 75,000 persons opinion.
Rob Ramson
Rob <indianrob@gmail.com> Mar 15 05:02PM -0400
While we are at statements that makes no sense -- why do we need a
community garden? Build simething else. We should elimimate that and make
the roof an area that students can learn how to grow vegeables in a green
house environment and maybr incorporate into their diet.
And let's not forget some solar panels.
Rob
Rob <indianrob@gmail.com> Mar 15 05:38PM -0400
Hey Eric,
First of all, they are not going to tell us the truth about the other
schools and why -- just something to justify what they want to do. It is
written all over their voice and actions -- and the fact that they feel
that they don't need to. Let's be real -- when is the last time you felt
that they were dealing from one deck of cards with us? It is always
some crap or politics or charter school or development involved. However,
we will see over the years to come.
While I agree with your statement here --- "While middle schoolers don't
generally have "after-care," one could do some really interesting things
with after school activities in combination with the rec center" --
whole-heartedly, I must say that there has to be a way to do this without
infringing upon the Rec. Center or the use of the Rec. center and the new
playground.
At the same time, think about this -- if an adjacent school is available
for use after school hours, I would be surprised if they would be
suggesting usage of the Gym and any other facility in that school if they
weren't bartering for use of Turkey Thicket's facilities. Funny how when
someone needs something, they are ready to share but if they didn't need,
DCPS would be calling all kinds of liability, asking for detailed usage and
operation -- yet we have to be satisfied with "we will work out a plan to
make the CO-USE seamless when it isnt so at the other locations --
according to the operators of the rec. center.
Personally, I still think that they are not going after Backus because
there are other plans -- other than UDC and they have plans for hamilton (
which is close enough to NY Ave Metro. By the way, as to the truancy issue
- kids travelling on a metro period is not helpful at all -- and how
dangeroys is it for our girls to be using the metro at that age - part of
the reason they are ending up pregnant. So please stop this metro nonsense.
What did we do before now -- Bunker Hill is not near a metro and Langdon is
not near a metro and last I checked, kids get to school at those locations.
Also, remember that kids from different neighborhoods being at a central
Rec. Center may come with some added issues that would be easier controlled
in a school setting but not open air recs. -- not that it couldn't be
worked out. My opinion -- it would be better to send the kids home or to
the rec. centers closer to home. 6 in one hand, 1/2 dozen in the other -
exceptbone might have some bodies and get innocent people hurt.
Just some thoughts of 1 / 75,000 so we have all the points in the open
before we make a $50 Mil. decision. So everyone understands -- anything
over there will look better and create a better use overall. Whether it is
optimum is a different story.
Rob Ramson
--
R. Ramson
3744 12th Street, N.E.,
Washington D.C., 20017
202-438-5988
"We must become the change we want to see" - Mohandas Gandhi-
(Together, for a Brighter Tomorrow)
"Jerome J. Peloquin" <jeromepeloquin@fastmail.fm> Mar 15 09:37PM -0400
Has anyone noticed that the Brookland Inn is gone?
Jerry in Nostalgia
----- Original message -----
From: Rob <[1]indianrob@gmail.com>
To: [2]ward5@yahoogroups.com, [3]wardfive@googlegroups.com
Subject: [WardFive] Re: [ward5] Ward5 discusses proposed middle school
at Turkey Thicket in Brookland: Standalone vs. Co-location with
Recreation Center
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:02:52 -0400
While we are at statements that makes no sense -- why do we need a
community garden? Build simething else. We should elimimate that and
make the roof an area that st
--
--
WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for community discussion and information sharing.
To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
--
WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for community discussion and information sharing.
To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WardFive" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
R. Ramson
3744 12th Street, N.E.,
Washington D.C., 20017
202-438-5988
"We must become the change we want to see" - Mohandas Gandhi-
(Together, for a Brighter Tomorrow)
--
--
WardFive@googlegroups.com is open to WardFive residents for community discussion and information sharing.
To post to this group, send email to wardfive@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wardfive?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WardFive" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wardfive+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
0 comments:
Post a Comment